<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: High Frequency Trading Algorithms Vastly Increasing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://data360.wordpress.com/2012/08/10/high-frequency-trading-algorithms-vastly-increasing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://data360.wordpress.com/2012/08/10/high-frequency-trading-algorithms-vastly-increasing/</link>
	<description>Because the news should be objective, clear and data-driven.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 07:18:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://data360.wordpress.com/2012/08/10/high-frequency-trading-algorithms-vastly-increasing/#comment-9392</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 19:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://data360.wordpress.com/?p=1272#comment-9392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey, I love the GIF but I&#039;d have to disagree with the conclusion that systems crashes are the fault of the algos. The notion that the weak hands must be protected against hiccups goes back beyond the bear raids of the 1800&#039;s. The notion that the liquidity providers are exercising undue influence on the market and thus manipulating the price at which they deal goes back much further. I think the real question is why do we allow order input and cancellations at the microsecond level? If the answer is: because it increases liquidity, then it seems like the case is closed. No?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I love the GIF but I&#8217;d have to disagree with the conclusion that systems crashes are the fault of the algos. The notion that the weak hands must be protected against hiccups goes back beyond the bear raids of the 1800&#8242;s. The notion that the liquidity providers are exercising undue influence on the market and thus manipulating the price at which they deal goes back much further. I think the real question is why do we allow order input and cancellations at the microsecond level? If the answer is: because it increases liquidity, then it seems like the case is closed. No?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
